by nlmcm » Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:45 pm
Many RS-RW enthusiast have tried Route Building, and finding it far more difficult to create than orignally thought, generally because their efforts are not what they had hoped or planned. It is candidly, a rather tedious task indeed (Cajon Pass Route, some 3,000 man hours), some expensive software may be needed for customizing certain buildings, like the Chicago skyline and Union Station. The software employed by RSC costs $5,000 per license (single rate, not bulk). There sotfware is the latest, its so great, more can be incorporated on the European Routes, without sacrificing Frame Rates per second (FR/s), even on older PC's.
An example:
My personal dream would be the infamous Race Track Alley of the CB&Q era.
Chicago Union Station to Aurora, IL and onward, to Burlington, Iowa, on the west side of the grand old Miss: Mississippi River. Total distance, over 200 hundred miles, mostly double tracked mainline, passing vast farming areas, Galesburg, IL would be one of the larger cities, ending in Burlington, IA, a modest sized community.
Race Track Alley still exists today, handling major freight traffic from Ciscero rail yards, mixed with Amtrack California Zephyr and the Empire Builder, at 79mph and heavy double decked commuter trains 24/7. On three tracks, with high speed crossovers, all the way to Aurora, a distance of some 28 miles. You want heavy A. I. Traffic? This would be one of them. CB&Q, shared these rails with Northern Pacific and Great Northern Railways, i.e., passenger traffic of North Coast Limited and the Empire Builder, just to name two.
Survey Questions - Your choice of a Route(s):
1. Can be either freeware or Add-on - YES or NO, another words, would you be willing to budget such a expenditure?
2. Which Route, i.e., CB&Q, Burlington Northern or BNSF, subdivision or district, i.e., Chicago downtown Union Station to Aurora, IL or continue to Galesburg, IL or beyond?
3. Specify your preference of era, Steam (before early 50's), 60-70"s (before Amtrack) or current.
4. Specify if you would like 3DTrains Scale Rail and Roads. Makes a big difference in realism and beauty, and does not affect Frame Rates/second. Costs is minimal, compared to any new route, which is already available for the Cajon Pass and some UK Routes.
5. Provide (optional) other details you would like to observe on your chosen route. Think of the details we have seen on Portland Terminal Route as an example.
Go for it ladies and gentlemen, let freeware and add-on developers know your dreams. Today! And include more than one if you like.
Clickity-Clack,
Peter
Copy and Paste for your Reply:
1. Freeware or Add-on - YES or NO
2. Route:
3. Era, Steam, Pre-Amtrack or current.
4. 3DTrains Scale Rail and Roads?
5. Provide (optional) other details.