Haystack wrote:They already made a SD70MAC, why do we need an 80?
Antwerp wrote:Haystack wrote:They already made a SD70MAC, why do we need an 80?
Because a CSX SD80Mac will probably work perfectly on the Coal District. Honestly I'm shocked it's not going to be in NS paint to completely go with the Coal District.
Haystack wrote:They already made a SD70MAC, why do we need an 80?
JohnTrainHead wrote:Haystack wrote:They already made a SD70MAC, why do we need an 80?
In that case, why do we need more DLCs period?
JohnTrainHead wrote:Haystack wrote:They already made a SD70MAC, why do we need an 80?
In that case, why do we need more DLCs period?
conrail1 wrote:they are probably going to do the DLC in CSX paint to please CSX fans who are complaining that there's to much NS stuff and then they will probably release a NS and Conrail repaint on marketplace. But eyin12s is probably going to have twice as much stuff as this.
Haystack wrote: Aesthetically it's the same loco. They should have improved something that's more common and overall a better loco such as the SD70Ace or the SD70M-2 since it's a pretty old model now. I'm sure there's die hard SD80MAC fans out there that will love this, but in my opinion it's a dying loco that will soon be forgotten all together. Not to mention they have a god awful cab.
Return to DTG DLC Development & WIP
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests