My First Complete Build w\ Liquid

Discussion about computers: Hardware, Problems, etc.

Re: My First Complete Build w\ Liquid

Unread postby arizonachris » Mon Apr 21, 2014 1:18 am

Walter, dude, seriously. That thing is a monster! Wow! **!!bow!!**
Ryzen 7 2700K, Asus Prime X570P, 32Gb DDR4, 2x 1Tb M.2 SSD's, RTX2060 6Gb, Occulus Rift
Win 10 Pro 64bit, keyboard/ mouse/ wheel/ pedals/ baseball bat
Security Coordinator on the Battleship Iowa
User avatar
arizonachris
 
Posts: 3955
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:36 am
Location: Southern California

Re: My First Complete Build w\ Liquid

Unread postby plovdiv21 » Mon Apr 21, 2014 3:35 pm

Beautiful rig,it may be overkill right now,but you should be all set well into the future with it.
User avatar
plovdiv21
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:13 pm

Re: My First Complete Build w\ Liquid

Unread postby Ericmopar » Mon Apr 21, 2014 4:43 pm

As far as the RAM. I keep trying to say that. All the game FPS tests show faster RAM doesn't allow more that a couple of FPS and is frequently less stable than 1333 or 1600 RAM.
Literally about 3 FPS max difference between slow and fast RAM.

Peter may be right about overclocking some. I found out recently with my single i5 3570K that I need a mild O.C. to about 3.8 ghz to smoothly feed my single GTX 780, even though Nvidia says "No" . I did a little searching and found I wasn't the only one that has discovered that in gaming.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWgzA2C61z4

That is a monster rig. :D
New build. i7-7700k, MSI Z270 Gaming M5 Mobo, Hyper 212 Evo, Corsair DDR4 3200 Mhz RAM, Klipsch Pro Mediea 2.1 Speakers, Samsung 850 Evo SSD, HAF XM Case, Asus Strix GTX 1070 and Cooler Master Storm XT Keyboard.
Slick with Pretty Rainbow Colors.
User avatar
Ericmopar
 
Posts: 2797
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 12:35 am
Location: Henderson NV.

Re: My First Complete Build w\ Liquid

Unread postby peterhayes » Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:24 pm

Eric
As far as the RAM. I keep trying to say that. All the game FPS tests show faster RAM doesn't allow more that a couple of FPS and is frequently less stable than 1333 or 1600 RAM.
Literally about 3 FPS max difference between slow and fast RAM.

Sorry *!!wink!!* that is not the case - fast RAM is as stable as slow RAM I have 2400Hz running side by side with 1600Hz and that are both Stable and there are no reports anywhere that fast RAM is NOT stable.
IMHO, using slow RAM on a fast OC'd cpu is like running a slow video card on the system ie changing a 780 for a 650 or similar. Memory management in Haswell needs fast RAM so that it can feed the very fast cpu with the data it needs to process. It may only be a minor gain in performance (fps is NOT an indicator of RAM/cpu performance) but it could increase smoothness when the system is under load. Its all about balance.

On a Sandybridge/Ivybridge system I would use 1600Hz RAM but on Haswell at least 2100Hz. Just an opinion.
Still if it works with lower RAM go for it as computers are strange beasts.
User avatar
peterhayes
 
Posts: 807
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:34 am
Location: Antipodes

Previous

Return to Geek Speak

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron