Peninsula Corridor: San Francisco – Gilroy route

[JohnS]

Ok I figured out some stuff. The No Driver versions of the NS cabcar and the F40 do NOT have the lens flare. I also noticed that even though the QD consists are built correct they are not built correct in the scenarios. They have drivers at both ends. So after editing a couple consists in the scenarios the lens flare on trailing equipment went away. Now the F40 with No Driver had the Ditch lights on so I removed them and also added the Marker lights to the F40 No Driver so they are lit when using that Locomotive. I didn't touch anything with the brakes because that issue seems to be scripting. Any way question is would you all like the Edited NO Driver F40 with markerlights? Only thing is you may need to edit your scenarios to use the correct Driver or NO driver version as needed. I can edit the scenarios too and they can be released along with the bin file. The lens flare will still always be there with the Driver versions even with the head light off for now but they look more prototypical when running by you or staged in the coach yards.
This is a continuation of the discussion in this topic: http://railworksamerica.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=19426

[dmgibbs1997]

I like the route, and I recommend it. But the only real problem I have with the F40 and NS Cabcar is that they don't have lights when being used as AI trains.

[JohnS]

I like the route, and I recommend it. But the only real problem I have with the F40 and NS Cabcar is that they don't have lights when being used as AI trains.

The consists are built wrong in scenarios causing the funky lighting.