STRM or REDEM

Discuss almost anything about RailWorks.

STRM or REDEM

Unread postby SithMurcielago » Mon Mar 28, 2011 5:43 pm

I'm curious to know becasue I never tried STRM. Redem is good, but is STRM better and more accurate?
Was formely known as Stmbuzz
For Train Blueprints, information visit my site at:
http://s4.zetaboards.com/railroadpol
Blog:
http://necrw.blogspot.com/
User avatar
SithMurcielago
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:24 am
Location: New York, USA

Re: STRM or REDEM

Unread postby Bananarama » Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:54 pm

SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) represents 30 and 90 meter DEM, while ReDem can handle up 1/9 arc-second, which is approximately 3 meter, with 1/3 arc second (10 meter) most common here in the states. The highest Railworks can display is 8 meter, so you could use 1/3 or 1/9 arc second DEM (the latter if available) from the USGS Seamless Server. ReDem is also more efficient, as you can specify the exact area you wish to do all in one sitting, without having to surf your route pressing the 'T' key, and hoping you don't run out of DEM or hit a seam, at which point Railworks has a nasty habit of crashing (30 meter only).

In short:
  • Railworks Editor - you got that one now
  • SRTM: Free, 90 meters global, 30 meter for North America and a few other countries (a bit of a pain to find the right coordinates needed, however)
  • ReDem - Faster and more efficient (you get a lot of program for peanuts)
  • USGS Seamless (BIL format, as used in RW): Free, 3 (a few US states), 10 (US and parts of Canada), 30 (US and Canada), and 90 meter (everywhere else), and much more accurate (no seams!)
Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains

Image
User avatar
Bananarama
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:17 am
Location: Another Planet

Re: STRM or REDEM

Unread postby gwgardner » Sat Apr 02, 2011 9:52 am

It's been a while, and my memory fades, but I once did a comparison of bil data with srtm (hgt?) data, for my route. I used both redem and the 'T' method for getting terrain in Railworks. I hope it is allowed to link to another forum, where I did the comparison.

http://www.trainsim.com/vbts/showthread ... s-hgt-data
gwgardner
 
Posts: 701
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:34 pm

Re: STRM or REDEM

Unread postby Trainguy76 » Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:05 pm

Okay so I've used SRTM for all of my routes so far, but how do I go about using BIL data?
User avatar
Trainguy76
 
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:46 am
Location: San Bernardino, California

Re: STRM or REDEM

Unread postby micaelcorleone » Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:28 am

Trainguy76 wrote:Okay so I've used SRTM for all of my routes so far, but how do I go about using BIL data?

ReDem uses BIL data. I use the program and it's easy to set up the route terrain with it.
The BIL data can be downloaded from the official seamless servers of the USGS.
User avatar
micaelcorleone
 
Posts: 1668
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:04 am
Location: Bavaria, Germany

Re: STRM or REDEM

Unread postby Hawk » Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:56 am

gwgardner wrote:I hope it is allowed to link to another forum, where I did the comparison.

Allowed? Appreciated is more the word in this instance !*salute*!
Hawk
 

Re: STRM or REDEM

Unread postby gwgardner » Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:59 am

One interesting thing I found, after using both bil and hgt data, was that there were a couple of tiles for some reason that I couldn't get to show up with bil data, and I was able to fill in with 'T' using hgt/SRTM.
gwgardner
 
Posts: 701
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:34 pm


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests