My review of Milepost Simulations "CP Canadian Mountain Passes"

So I decided to write a personal review of the route that was just released featuring CP's Kicking Horse Pass and Rogers Pass. I felt like I could give a good review for others to read since I personally have driven over the route a few times myself in real life.
The route uses many RSC assets from other routes for many of its objects but does have a number of custom structures and objects that were created specifically for this route. Milepost really captured the feel of the area with the route for me from what I can remember and what I have photographed from my times in the area, although due to the limits of railworks it cant be the exact same as it is in real life. There are many good features about the route and there is also a few negative things about it too. Good things I can find are things like how the track placement in most areas is very accurate, thick forests which give a good depth of how lush the area is with growth, and prototypical rolling stock among other things. Some negative things I found are (some are RSC's fault) the roads used in the route are of the really shotty default cajon pass roads which are scaled completely wrong, missing reporting marks on most rolling stock, and the water in the rivers and lakes are the wrong color for the region; the water in the area is mostly glacier fed and has a very light blue color to it. (look at pictures of the river around Lake Louise) But if you can look past the few negative things about this route (which isn't really too many) The rolling stock for this route also have the new braking physics which greatly increases the realism of handling a heavy freight train although the delay from applying brakes to the pressure in your brake cylinder seems a few seconds too long in some cases. I think you will find yourself with something that gives you a true feel for mountain railroading at its finest.
What it includes that's worth speaking of:
-2 mountain passes in 1 route; rogers pass and kicking horse pass
-many prototypical buildings and other structures from the area
-prototypical rolling stock for the route
-ES44AC
-Cylindrical grain hopper (prototypical up to last year, now all read only CP not CPWX as they have been patched after the grain board was disbanded)
-3 bay potash hopper (has CanPotash logo which is a neat knockoff of the real one which reads CanPotex)
-50ft highcube (missing reporting marks and logo)
-60ft boxcar (this one is missing the marks and logo too, but this car sucks I wish rsc would stop using it)
-89ft autorack (has CP reporting marks)
-default tank car (boring)
-Intermodal car (missing reporting marks)
-coal hopper (missing reporting marks)
-4 chute covered hopper (missing reporting marks)
Pros:
-new rolling stock
-good scenery
-custom structures
-proper names for sidings
-realistic quick drive consists which are correct for this section of CP's routes
-its Canadian
Cons:
-Missing reporting marks on rolling stock
-water has the wrong shade of blue for the area
-braking still needs some tweaking here and there since its something new and still has a few bugs
-spur for the sawmill at golden is missing
-couplers are a tad stretchy and makes the end of the train bounce back and forth a little
Overall I would give this route a 9.2 out of ten
How it stacks up to some other routes in my opinion:
Stevens Pass 9.6
Mountain Passes 9.2
Sherman Hill 8.8
Marias Pass 8.3
Surfliner 8.0
I would recommend this route to anyone who is interested in mountain freight operatons or someone who likes to look at scenery, its a great route. Also if you don't like what I have said in my review and would like to comment please do but nothing ignorant, remember this is just my opinion, yours may differ.
The route uses many RSC assets from other routes for many of its objects but does have a number of custom structures and objects that were created specifically for this route. Milepost really captured the feel of the area with the route for me from what I can remember and what I have photographed from my times in the area, although due to the limits of railworks it cant be the exact same as it is in real life. There are many good features about the route and there is also a few negative things about it too. Good things I can find are things like how the track placement in most areas is very accurate, thick forests which give a good depth of how lush the area is with growth, and prototypical rolling stock among other things. Some negative things I found are (some are RSC's fault) the roads used in the route are of the really shotty default cajon pass roads which are scaled completely wrong, missing reporting marks on most rolling stock, and the water in the rivers and lakes are the wrong color for the region; the water in the area is mostly glacier fed and has a very light blue color to it. (look at pictures of the river around Lake Louise) But if you can look past the few negative things about this route (which isn't really too many) The rolling stock for this route also have the new braking physics which greatly increases the realism of handling a heavy freight train although the delay from applying brakes to the pressure in your brake cylinder seems a few seconds too long in some cases. I think you will find yourself with something that gives you a true feel for mountain railroading at its finest.
What it includes that's worth speaking of:
-2 mountain passes in 1 route; rogers pass and kicking horse pass
-many prototypical buildings and other structures from the area
-prototypical rolling stock for the route
-ES44AC
-Cylindrical grain hopper (prototypical up to last year, now all read only CP not CPWX as they have been patched after the grain board was disbanded)
-3 bay potash hopper (has CanPotash logo which is a neat knockoff of the real one which reads CanPotex)
-50ft highcube (missing reporting marks and logo)
-60ft boxcar (this one is missing the marks and logo too, but this car sucks I wish rsc would stop using it)
-89ft autorack (has CP reporting marks)
-default tank car (boring)
-Intermodal car (missing reporting marks)
-coal hopper (missing reporting marks)
-4 chute covered hopper (missing reporting marks)
Pros:
-new rolling stock
-good scenery
-custom structures
-proper names for sidings
-realistic quick drive consists which are correct for this section of CP's routes
-its Canadian
Cons:
-Missing reporting marks on rolling stock
-water has the wrong shade of blue for the area
-braking still needs some tweaking here and there since its something new and still has a few bugs
-spur for the sawmill at golden is missing
-couplers are a tad stretchy and makes the end of the train bounce back and forth a little
Overall I would give this route a 9.2 out of ten
How it stacks up to some other routes in my opinion:
Stevens Pass 9.6
Mountain Passes 9.2
Sherman Hill 8.8
Marias Pass 8.3
Surfliner 8.0
I would recommend this route to anyone who is interested in mountain freight operatons or someone who likes to look at scenery, its a great route. Also if you don't like what I have said in my review and would like to comment please do but nothing ignorant, remember this is just my opinion, yours may differ.