Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3

Discuss almost anything about RailWorks.

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby johnmckenzie » Tue Aug 23, 2011 2:48 pm

I reckon I will. Thanks!! !!*ok*!!
User avatar
johnmckenzie
 
Posts: 642
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:17 am
Location: Lancashire, England

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby kevarc » Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:13 pm

It was not a radio, it was an induction telephone with very limited range.

http://kc.pennsyrr.com/faqs/trainphone.php
Kevin Arceneaux
Lonewolf activities at 3dtrains
User avatar
kevarc
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:48 pm
Location: Lafayette, La

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby TVRRMAN » Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:48 am

johnmckenzie wrote:Maybe you can answer this one for me - Why was everything fitted with radio phones?


The PRR pretty much pioneered the radio while everyone else was still using hand signals and paper bulletins. Pretty much everything on the PRR got radio antennas. Steam Locomotives, Diesels, Cabooses, and Passenger Cars.[/quote]

John,

Not everything PRR got Trainphone. units exempt from it were typically units not used in mainline usage (The H Series lacked them, as did the yard switchers - Alco S Series, and FM's with exception to the H20-44, which did receive them. The H20-44 also doubled for a road unit.

In the Passenger Car roster, the antennas were typically found on the Business car fleet, lounge cars, and the tail cars.

While posting, I'll also take time to address the Tuscan colored F7 idea: In reality, the only "F" Series locomotives in the PRR fleet painted Tuscan were not straight F7's, but FP7's, and I believe only one A-B-A pair was painted as such. The B unit, despite being mated up with two FP7's and in matching Tuscan, was merely an F7b with passenger gearing. The few FP7 A-B-A pairs that were on the roster oddly enough were utilized more in freight service than wit the passenger trains they were intended to haul.
Thomas J Pearce
Image
http://www.bllw.net
Broadway Limited Locomotive Works Payware Department
TVRRMAN
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:06 pm
Location: Near Pittsburgh PA

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby johnmckenzie » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:52 am

kevarc wrote:It was not a radio, it was an induction telephone with very limited range.

http://kc.pennsyrr.com/faqs/trainphone.php


Yep, saw that - thanks !!*ok*!!
User avatar
johnmckenzie
 
Posts: 642
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:17 am
Location: Lancashire, England

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby micaelcorleone » Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:16 am

styckx wrote:If it wasn't for the PRR much of what you know about U.S. railroading probably wouldn't exist in its current form. They were setting standards before standards were even standard. :) That railroad was a pioneer in railroading in multiple forms.

Yes, indeed. It's incredible to see how much progress there was.
Just watched this film: Trains on fire - Pennsylvania Railroad 1955 - "What in Blazes" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkUQ3rTfU4s
They had built-in CO2 fire extinguish sytems in the 50s (!).
User avatar
micaelcorleone
 
Posts: 1668
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:04 am
Location: Bavaria, Germany

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby styckx » Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:10 am

Yummy..

Image
User avatar
styckx
 
Posts: 992
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:27 pm

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby thecanadianrail » Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:22 am

styckx wrote:Yummy..

Image


ooh flatcars, piggyback service, and......uhh, what is that other one between the piggyback cars????? !**conf**!
User avatar
thecanadianrail
 
Posts: 2613
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:36 am
Location: Manitoba, Canada

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby styckx » Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:51 am

No idea. Looks like a low cut ore cars?
User avatar
styckx
 
Posts: 992
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:27 pm

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby ozinoz » Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:51 pm

The next question is, how much are users going to be prepared to pay for this new route?? This route only comes FOC when you purchase the new version, it is not included in the upgrade path. While it looks nice from what has been seen, personally, if it is not steam friendly (service facilities etc) then I will pass.

!*cheers*!
ozinoz
 
Posts: 1622
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:59 am
Location: Antipodes

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby thecanadianrail » Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:58 pm

ozinoz wrote:The next question is, how much are users going to be prepared to pay for this new route?? This route only comes FOC when you purchase the new version, it is not included in the upgrade path. While it looks nice from what has been seen, personally, if it is not steam friendly (service facilities etc) then I will pass.

!*cheers*!


where is the proof in this, where did you hear this???
User avatar
thecanadianrail
 
Posts: 2613
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:36 am
Location: Manitoba, Canada

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby Chessie8638 » Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:33 pm

thecanadianrail: where is the proof in this, where did you hear this???
TS2012 FAQ.

Chessie8638 on Page 3 wrote:Right off the TS2012 FAQ:

Yes! Train Simulator 2012 will retain all the locomotives and routes previously included with RailWorks 2, PLUS a brand new EMD F7
locomotive and a new UK locomotive to be revealed shortly. Also, we will have an amazing new route, fully optimized to show off all
the new technology, this will be available bundled with every new purchase of the Train Simulator 2012 Steam Edition. Existing users
will be able to buy this new route as DLC from our Steam store.


ozinoz:The next question is, how much are users going to be prepared to pay for this new route?? This route only comes FOC when you purchase the new version, it is not included in the upgrade path. While it looks nice from what has been seen, personally, if it is not steam friendly (service facilities etc) then I will pass.

Hopefully (have my doubts) Altoona will be modeled accurately for the time period. In 1958 Altoona still had multiple Roundhouses.
Chessie8638
 

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby ozinoz » Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:09 pm

Altoona would dwarf anything previously modelled in RW and would probably bring it to its knees. Large yards in the US are probably beyond the performance curve of what a home sim can provide. Not only is there yards etc, they need to be populated with static and AI traffic.

Still, happy to wait and see - only a month to go. Fingers crossed for another vid tomorrow...

!*cheers*!
ozinoz
 
Posts: 1622
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:59 am
Location: Antipodes

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby steve_the_slim » Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:00 pm

The Barstow-San Bernardino route has a massive yard. Granted, it's probably pretty under-populated in most of the scenarios, but it shows big yards are doable.
I am become rust, ...destroyer of trains.
-dogmouse
steve_the_slim
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:59 pm

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby Chock » Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:04 pm

I'll be happy to pay the additional cost for this route, and not only because it happens to be in my particular area of interest for US railroading, I would buy it anyway in order to support the company since they are banging out the upgrade for free. We are getting a lot of bang for no bucks whatsoever with that upgrade, and whilst it is true that the upgrade is in a sense the carrot/stick platform for further add-ons, thus economically viable to knock out for free, I still want to show appreciation for the work they've put in because it would have been easy for them to stay with the present 3D engine and graphics and milk that for all it was worth, but instead the new engine demonstrates a commitment to wanting a quality product that will improve the actual notion of simulating driving a train. The fact that it is a route I'd particularly want is of course a big plus for me, but I would have bought it anyway.

With regard to fully modeling the PRR's Atloona works in it glory days, I suspect that is unlikely, since at its peak the site covered 255 acres (that's well over three million square feet) and it had considerably more than one hundred works buildings on that site, which in addition to being a massive modeling task, would be tricky to model anyway since most of them are now gone and it would therefore require a lot of research in order to get them right.

For those who like trivia, the Atloona Works was such a massive and important site to US industry that it was targeted by German secret agents in 1942, who arrived in the US by U-Boat (i.e. submersible Type VII U-Boats, not the GE U25B LOL). Their mission was codenamed Operation Pastorius, and was intended to sabotage quite a lot of targets in the Eastern US, including the Horseshoe Curve, the Atloona loco repair facilities, the hydroelectric generators at Niagara Falls, Aluminium and Cryolite facilities in Illinois, plus several railway stations in the region including Pennsylvania Station at Newark. It was foiled by the fact that one of the agents wanted to defect to the US and turned himself in, his interrogation eventually led to the arrest of the other members of the team, most of whom were executed although some were imprisoned and later deported to West Germany after WW2. There was actually a film, (very loosely) based on this event made in 1943 as a bit of a flag-waver, not very imaginatively, but undeniably emotively entitled, 'They came to blow up America'. Although it is a bit naff, with mostly cardboard cut out Nazi characters, it does actually star a decent actor, George Sanders, who has a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame and did win an Oscar for his role in All About Eve, so it is a bit better than most films of its ilk.

Al
Chock
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: UK, Stockport

Re: Pennsylvania Railroad Confirmed in RW3(?)

Unread postby styckx » Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:28 pm

Conway yard is massive and runs just fine.
User avatar
styckx
 
Posts: 992
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:27 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests