PapaXpress wrote:You are forgetting to add the "Steam Time Disruption Field Equation"
dejoh wrote:Thank you Tori. The voice of reason. I too hope people think before they spout.
Toripony wrote:Tomorrow (or tonight?) promises to be a very exciting day for us ... . Let us not fall victim to bad behavior such as we sometimes see in our online communities. While I'm sure that RSC will appreciate useful and concise feedback, I hope I don't come online tomorrow to find broad, bad-tasting, generalities ... . ...
PapaXpress wrote:You are forgetting to add the "Steam Time Disruption Field Equation"
Toripony wrote:Tomorrow (or tonight?) promises to be a very exciting day for us ... . Let us not fall victim to bad behavior such as we sometimes see in our online communities. While I'm sure that RSC will appreciate useful and concise feedback, I hope I don't come online tomorrow to find broad, bad-tasting, generalities ... . ...
Chessie8638 wrote:That's why I have my popcorn ready for the laughs on other train simulation sites.
Dan wrote:The sad thing is that reading around elsewhere it is clear that some people are going to download it just to find things to complain about, just to find the things that RW3 doesn't do etc which all in all is pretty depressing.
shicoe30 wrote:I really don't understand why everyone who is stuck on MSTS or Trainz HATES RW so much. I don't see us bashing on them....much, what's their ** problem(s)(I assume they have more than just one problem if they have to go to war against a simulator)? ...sheesh....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest