merciless245 wrote:I just don't understand the no to Canada part of all this. Have they forgotten about all the Canadian operations they have? Shame they are doing this but at least this will have DTG doing other railroads for a while.

Mavadelo wrote:BoostedFridge wrote:Signed.
Mavadelo, I would suggest sharing this on the UKTS an other international forums as well
submitted at ukts (needs aproval), rail-sim.de, oldtimerklubben.dk and railsim.es as well as requested justtrains and trains and drivers sites to support :)
Thanks all for signing, hope many will follow

buzz456 wrote:Smart folks.
Mavadelo wrote:buzz456 wrote:Smart folks.
not sure how to see this, I hope you mean us by smart folks :)
A huge thank you so far, the petition has breached 100 signers and this is made possible because of the support from our US friends. As the discussions go on on the steam forums about this we think we cracked the reason for this based upon replies members got when writing BNSF. What it basically comes down to is that BNSF actually can't forbid DTG use outside the USA since they have not regsitered their brand outside the USA. However they can tell DTG that if DTG would sell outside the USA, they revoke the rights for sale within the USA, a simple form of blackmail I would say. However this also means the petition has a chance of succeeding if enough people participate so keep sharing this with your friends, US and non US alike and maybe as a community we can bring about change
as for UKTS: the topic someone opened about BNSF not available anymore got indeed locked however the post someone made containing the link to the petition has not been removed. However the petition topic I made didn't pass approval from the mods and in fact I have been placed "under moderation" when it comes to posting there. I am not in the game of bashing a site and given the history and founders of ukts I am not even surprised about it. So please do not look "cross eyed" towards UKTS as they actually allowed more than usual with allowing that post with the link
Again, many thanks to all of you who signed so far, it is hugely appreciated
JerryC wrote:Lemme see if I can shed a little light on the UKTS situation.
Matt Peddlesden = Product Development at DTG. Former Gatekeeper for third-party add-ons, he's the guy working to bring you the Unreal 4 version.
Peter Peddlesden = Heavily involved, if not the man in charge, at UKTS.
There you have it folks, nepotism at work!


JerryC wrote:Well, it could be worse. You could have said I was related to the guy who used to own the Forum.



Users browsing this forum: PetalBot and 1 guest