
mdurdan wrote:In the K4 thread I was looing rely closely and pointing out every error, witch alot of people took it in the way that I was bashing RSC. I was simply trying to post some constructive criticisim, meaning that if RSC sees it they will mostlikely say "wow we have made alot of non prototypical mistakes, we better fix this". Although on one ocasion I did post a forum bashing RSC a while back, but I later took it down after discovering that it was a problem with my laptop


buzz456 wrote:This place is for positive stuff.![]()

I think most third party add on's are way better than what comes out of RSC. 
arizonachris wrote:M, you can call it criticism, or bug reporting. Doesn't matter. Like Ed said, just no personal attacks and keep it civil. I totally agree with that, and hope RSC reads what you post (you really didin't post any bugs in this Thread, BTW)
Most of the guys that put out the third party DLC are working hard to fix them to RW3 status, give them a bit of time. I know a few third party dev's have said "Nay Nay" to RW3, well it's their loss as well as ours. Not much we can do, my friend.
Oh, my![]()
I think most third party add on's are way better than what comes out of RSC.
It was only a matter of time RSderek wrote:I read the boards often in my spare time over a coffee. I don't always log in tho.
However, if you have problems or concerns and you want them to be taken into account then please email support.
regards
Derek
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests