Screenshot Comparisions.

[trev123]

index.jpeg

Saluda1 (1).jpg

As posted in the Geek section I have a new monitor. The old one was only 60Hz the new one can go up to 165Hz. Here are 2 screenshots of the Saluda Route taken on my old monitor at 60Hz and the other at 165Hz. I just want to know if there is any difference as I cannot tell. The top one is 165Hz and the bottom one is 60Hz. Edit. Seeing them both together I can tell that the 165Hz one is the better showing much more detail. That is the top screenshot.

[spartantrain32]

The top as youve said looks more sharp.

[AmericanSteam]

What AA setting are you using?

[trev123]

What AA setting are you using?

FXAA + 3x3 SSAA and Anisotopic x8

[trev123]

What AA setting are you using?

FXAA + 3x3 SSAA and Anisotopic x8

[AmericanSteam]

Have you noticed improved frame rates?

[trev123]

Have you noticed improved frame rates?

Running at 165Hz instead of 60Hz I have noticed a FPS drop of about 20 FPS down from 60 FPS to about 40 FPS which is still acceptable for me. That is on the Saluda route. As you know FPS varies from route to route.

[AmericanSteam]

Try reducing your AA settings. I went to FXaa+2x2SSAA and picked up 20 fps and did not notice any visual difference. I used the Curves setting in reshade to compensate.