by Coaltrain1 » Sat Jul 05, 2014 1:31 pm
Very Good point, But I am to far along to change this now. I'll have to dig into the history books and find a way for the RW&A & The LS&W to assume control of the trackage. Most likely the Interstate commerce Act of 1887, with provisions also included in the Hepburn Act. Whereas the Attorney general for the State of not named here for privacy concerns filed suit against the two major Class 1 railroads not named for privacy concerns for Price fixing on freight, and Per diem charges, to whereas making it impossible for interstate commerce to be conducted fairly and in a timely Manner..
Although the Interstate Commerce Commission was largely ineffectual prior to 1900, the onset of the Progressive Movement revived the issue of regulation. Most Americans were of the opinion that more stringent controls were needed to prevent abuses such as those perceived within the financial markets -- and which on occasion had led to great collapses of railroad systems, as well as the resultant loss of investor fortunes. It was obvious that something needed to be done to restore the public's confidence.
In this light, President Theodore Roosevelt in 1901 directed his attorney general to file suit -- under the provisions of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act -- against Northern Securities, a giant holding company formed by railroad consolidationists Edward H. Harriman and James J. Hill. The company was outlawed in 1904, and later that year Roosevelt was reelected to a second term. Before the year was out, Roosevelt asked Congress to increase the powers of the I.C.C. This was done overwhelmingly with passage of the Hepburn Act, which empowered the commission to establish "just and reasonable" maximum rates
On May 3rd 1905 The RW&A & LS&W were Granted track age rights as well as control of movement on said track age from both Class 1 Rail Roads not named here for Privacy concerns therefor eliminating undue freight charges and allowing total access to all industrial and commercial trackage within the said Municipalities not named here for privacy concerns.