There are versions for NS and NORAC (not visible on the screenshot),
in both cases the scripts of the "permissive" and the "restricted" signals are not the same !
Here the info I've got from the blueprints :
- Code: Select all
smm_griswold_H232 T0 P.xml
name: RCAP: NS_GSW H2/32T0P
description: Griswold RR signal, 2 Head 3 over 2 Aspect Signal, 1 Link to Track, Permissive.
script: RCAP\NorthAmerica\RailNetwork\Signals\Griswold\US NS Post 2 Head P
geo: smm_griswold_p2p
smm_griswold_H232 T0 R.xml
name: RCAP: NS_GSW H2/32T0R
description: Griswold RR signal, 2 Head 3 over 2 Aspect Signal, 1 Link to Track, Restricted (no signals beyond last link).
script: RCAP\NorthAmerica\RailNetwork\Signals\Griswold\US NS Post 2 Head 1R
geo: smm_griswold_p2
The signals and scripts for NORAC rules are named with the same scheme, just "NORAC" instead of "NS" : smm_griswold_NORAC_H232 T0 P.xml / smm_griswold_NORAC_H232 T0 R.xml
Unfortunately I am not good with eastern signals,
all I can say the aspects should/must differ.
Models may look the same in the editor, but you do not see the naming of the lights inside the model. These react according to the scripts.
Do a test with a standard scenario, that is the only way that works.