OpenRailer90 wrote:It's so pathetic especially that DTG's very last release, the APT-P was of remarkable standards. Having broken functions after a near-perfect release is such a major low. The NJT F40PH's issues were addressed so idk why they would add more issues.
ex-railwayman wrote: I'm positive in real life you could have been able to park up an SW1200/1500/MP15 on both of those 2 roads, before the metal gate was situated there, and rail access to the cement plant was curtailed, possibly even position a solitary 2 bay cement hopper there, and be able to change the point levers effectively.
Cheerz. Steve.
BNSFdude wrote:The route overall is very nice with plenty of new opportunities for operations. The Nippon Sharyo stock looks great, and sounds pretty good, but the brake schedule issues make running them a little disappointing. The F40 on the other hand is missing an entire back wall of detail, and there's so many bugs with it that make it undriveable. Not to mention a huge FPS issue with the F40 and N-S stock when sitting as static consists by defaulting the damned cab lights to on when not player controlled. Of course the lights are all shadow casting so having more than one static consist in a scene will tank FPS. I'm running an i7 7700k, and a 1070, so the performance hit is absolutely unacceptable.
Don't get me started on this.
Kevin wrote:Another likely performance hit is the fact that the highly detailed gallery car cab view is also used in the external view for no obvious gain.
BNSFdude wrote:The brakes on the F40... yikes.
BNSFdude wrote:I don't even mean just the gauges, the brakes are just about unusable on this. The F40 and galleries should have the 24RL like brake schedule that NJT has... I think it's called 26E, whereas they have that on the Baby Bullet stock which should have 30CDW.
The brakes are about as bad as the stock PSL equipment was.
JohnS wrote:Is the speedo in the F40 supposed to have lit numbers and dots around it? Who do they use for BETA testing on these releases anyway? I don't think DTG listens anyway at this point. Reminds me of a saying I heard a several years ago, " you'll have to pass it so we can see what's in it".
JohnS wrote:Is the speedo in the F40 supposed to have lit numbers and dots around it? Who do they use for BETA testing on these releases anyway? I don't think DTG listens anyway at this point. Reminds me of a saying I heard a several years ago, " you'll have to pass it so we can see what's in it".
Return to DTG DLC Development & WIP
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests