tycoonkid9 wrote:BNOV2: Yes.
Sully: Keep in mind it is a WIP shot. DTG may leak further WIP shots that have the rest of the NJCL and maybe even the section between Newark Penn and New York Penn with better trackwork. Thanks for noting that the NS GP38-2 Hi Hood lacks the cab signalling for this route. Is the NYNH SD40-2 seen on those local train? Anyhows a NS GP38-2 low hood with cab signalling can be one of the many included locomotives with this route. Or even the VRC CSX GP40-2.
rarecommonsense wrote:emd645e3 wrote:Yes. Freight has had their time.

OldProf wrote:rarecommonsense wrote:emd645e3 wrote:Yes. Freight has had their time.
Is it really necessary to remind anyone that in real railroading freight pays the bills, regardless of who "they" might be? For my money and time, TS is and has always been a rail simulator well worth what I continually pay out for DLC. In my favorite activities both as a player and as a scenario writer freight dominates, but that doesn't demand or mean that I condemn passenger activity as having had its time. As I see it, there's room for all of us and thus it should remain.
rarecommonsense wrote:OldProf wrote:rarecommonsense wrote:emd645e3 wrote:Yes. Freight has had their time.
Is it really necessary to remind anyone that in real railroading freight pays the bills, regardless of who "they" might be? For my money and time, TS is and has always been a rail simulator well worth what I continually pay out for DLC. In my favorite activities both as a player and as a scenario writer freight dominates, but that doesn't demand or mean that I condemn passenger activity as having had its time. As I see it, there's room for all of us and thus it should remain.
Well, that comment wasn't in any way intended to rattle any bones, or start a debate about which is better. Or who pays the bills, for that matter. Respectfully, I could really care less to be honest. I just felt there needs to be more of a balance in the type of American based content that's been released so far, and I stand firm with it. End of story!
emd645e3 wrote:
Seconded that. Freight has a big role but does not out wieght the fact that commuter railroad pays the bills as well. How do you think millions of people get to and from work everyday? Cars, Bus, and Train. You just can't single out on type of railroading in America. Its been lopsided for years now but I guess DTG finally is seeing were the DLC profits are atm. We needed something refreshing and I think commuter or passenger DLC is that refreshment.
JohnTrainHead wrote:Looks great and all but why New York again?
rarecommonsense wrote:JohnTrainHead wrote:Looks great and all but why New York again?
This is actually mostly New Jersey, really.. the route, however does originate out of New York Penn Station , and Hoboken, New Jersey. And as for why? You're in the wrong place to ask that. And why not.. is the question. But with many, like myself, who have feverishly requested anything NJT, this is a victory. And possibly just a taste of what's to come. Besides, New York, like other major areas of the US, has a lot to offer, when it comes to railroading. Especially when it comes to passenger rail. The busiest, if not the most important rail network in the entire country.
tycoonkid9 wrote:With that in mind, having the LIRR for TS2016 or TS2017 UE4 is a possibility, maybe a network of LIRR lines (With Penn, LI City, and Atl. Term.) round New York extending up to Babylon.
_o_OOOO_oo-Kanawha wrote:Any indication yet as to what part of the network is actually modeled?
Where is that first picture located? On the NEC or on the line to Hoboken?
I gather, NJT uses the NEC like NYC Penn Station-Secaucus-Newark Penn-Rahwah Jct, and then branches off.
So part of the present NEC route could be re-used, I hope they'd include Hoboken terminal with Manhattan across the Hudson.
Return to DTG DLC Development & WIP
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest