by LGM118 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:05 pm
One trend has definitely been the abundance of western routes through mountains compared to fast routes. The list of prototpyical US routes purchasable on Steam is as follows:
Marias Pass, Stevens Pass, Donner Pass, Pacific Surfliner, Portland Terminal, Northeast Corridor, Horseshoe Curve
Of those, four are slow routes through mountains with minimal passenger traffic, and two of the others have pretty much only passenger traffic, and the last one is a terminal railroad. There's definitely a case to be made that at least a few people have pointed out to Dovetail Games that all of the fast, busy lines are European while all the single-track and mountain routes are American. I'm guessing that they might be developing routes that "break the mold" in tandem - a German route that features more slow freight and terrain, and an American route with heavier traffic and commuter traffic.
Another factor is that DTG generally has been trying tomake sure US routes feature both passenger and freight traffic. That makes a lot of sense and there's really no way to argue that they shouldn't make routes with wider appeal. The immediate route I think of that meets all those qualifications is the BNSF "Racetrack" - Chicago to Aurora (or, possibly, line extended to Galesburg or Davenport). There's definitely a lot of passenger and freight traffic, and it's also fairly diverse, allowing for a wide range of options. One concern is complexity - the barrier to any Chicago route is that once in Chicago, there's a multitude of railyards, transfer routes, etc. that complicate things. It would make the north end of the Pacific Surfliner route look like a branch line, more or less. That said, the traffic mix and appeal are very well-known and hard to ignore. Probably the only reason this route doesn't already exist is complexity.
I definitely think this route will happen at some point, and the fact that it's been overlooked almost entirely by all train simulation games is pretty shocking. There's a good argument that the Pacific Surfliner was a bit of a "test" to see how well they could develop a line with a lot of complexity and how well it would be received. Not to mention that the triple-track mainline on the BNSF Racetrack definitely has "signalling systems" worth mentioning and spending quite a lot of time on. Given the biggest complain that people make about the NEC route is that it doesn't cover Philly-DC, I imagine DTG would want to make sure they build out the line to at least 100 miles. Chicago-Galesburg would be the logical length (162 miles - which is about the length of recent US route releases). It fits all the qualifications needed for a successful route: 1) Playability, 2) well-known route, 3) variety of operations and wide spread of "area types". Either DTG thinks it's too complex to do it well, or they aren't sure whether it would sell outside the US market.