fecrails wrote:I didn't know people still used desktop computers. I haven't used one for years. I personally can't imagine being chained to a desk to use my computer, especially for a hobby. I run TS2013 on a Macbook Pro at 25-35 fps and enjoy playing from my recliner without a stiff neck or sore back! Like any desktop system, you just have to buy the proper hardware for the job and TS2013 runs fine. Form factor of the machine has nothing to do with performance if you compare apples to apples.
As for the TS2014 announcement, speculating on the performance or merits of something none of us have seen or used strikes me as tad premature.

Well I do expect the performance to go down for me if Marias Pass is any indicator. That's not RSC's fault. As they increase the abilities of the sim, it will be more demanding on my hardware. And since my hardware is a static spec, I would naturally have to upgrade to a better laptop or adjust the performance sliders accordingly. I can't expect them to cater to lowest common denominator rigs like mine.
As for the merits of something none of us have seen or used? Very true. But at the same time you can at least comment on the concept. Some of the features people might not be interested in. It's just some of these things are nice, but I can't recall people on this forum or the other sim forum I get on asking for most of this.
A funny thought about RSC crossed my mind since my last post on how they do things. Imagine RSC is mayor of the city and we are his residents. I email him saying I have pot holes in front of my house, could you please fix them. A year later the mayor shows up at my door. He points out in the distance and says "Look at the brand new state of art sports arena we built". And I say... "Yes... you're right. That is quite a sports arena you built there. By the way...... are you gonna fix my pot holes?". And he responds "Ah yes.... it's a beautiful sports arena isn't it?"

I personally think at some point RSC needs to make a brand new sim from scratch. There is a term in programming called "spaghetti code". Microsoft Windows is a perfect example of it. Because Windows has to maintain so much compatibility with it's legacy Windows programs, it never advances it's performance as much as it could if it didn't have to remain compatible. It's a mish-mash of new and legacy code for compatibilities sake. As a result, it becomes bloated and the footprint on disk and in memory slowly creeps higher with each new version.
That's what I think RSC needs to do at some point. There is just so far they can go with the current foundation code before they start hitting the law of diminishing returns. I think they need to make a whole new sim from scratch and keep a version of Railworks available (like 2014) for all the legacy stuff. Cuz I can't see how long they can stick with this core foundation code.
As for those people that are mad? Meh.... I was really mad last year. This time around my anger has just turned to pure bewilderment. Anger doesn't do me any good cuz it's not gonna change anything.
Just be happy it's a free upgrade and get excited we are getting more draw distance. Can't complain there. But this time I'm not buying 2014 until I see what's up with 2015. Donner Pass is the only route included with 2014 that I would want....and I already have it. So.... I just save my money and pin my hopes on 2015 and enjoy 2014 for what it is....FREE.