katyusha454 wrote:goddrauG wrote:Were they seriously not willing to put in Coca Cola?
Corporations in the US are so lawsuit-happy that I think Coke really would have sued DTG if they put in a coke sign without paying big licensing fees.
buzz456 wrote:I think that's nonsense. Coke has way more important things on their minds. It's just a excess of caution on the part of DTG.
Coke probably does have more important things to do, but how about their lawyers? Or maybe not even their (own) lawyers, but some other lawyers that may have been contracted or allowed to pursue potential copyright infringements around the globe on their own accord, paying [insert big biz company name here] some of their, uhm, "earnings" in the end? A bit like the way that some (?) phone companies do it, selling off old minor unpaid bills to law firms who then claim the money on their behalf, usually adding their own hefty fees and whatnot to it. The bills alone are probably too small for the big phone company to pursue, but by handing them over to some 'freelancing' lawyers who can then add their own fees, it's a win-win for both parties.
TLDR: Big business is totally out of control, everywhere on the world. I totally understand DTG's caution with this.
EDIT: Seems I got a little off topic just now... trying to get back on topic... THANK YOU for the signs update for the SN route! This is a much appreciated little extra that adds to the great old-time atmosphere of the route.