by minerman146 » Wed Aug 24, 2016 6:13 pm
After 2.5 years of work, I had the opportunity to show the Bergen to my father. We can safely say things have changed a bit since he left the railroad in 1978. The changes made sense to him. Firstly we got into a small argument about why so much emphasis was put into the scenery. His argument-he definitely did not have the time to count daisies along the main. He was too busy watching his amps and his air to look to see if he could spot a gas station. In essence, what he saw was a wall of trees, bushes and the backs of buildings interrupted only by named crossings he had to know. Air is a huge deal as he only ran with 75 pounds (the NY Division is relatively flat) but you still needed to know your air. Startups, if you were not on a hill, you did not just slap it into notch one to get going - you took the brakes off, stuck your head out the cab and watched the ties, once you started moving THEN you went to notch one. Slack. The man is obsessed with slack. Breaking drawbars was a huge issue, and you applied brake over hills, while under power to prevent that. How did you do it, you took the cork out of a fuse-e stuck that in the train brake to keep it depressed, then you could apply the train brake applications and not have to keep the brake depressed. Other observations - I nailed the Bergen and most definitely at Garfield, Plauderville, Glenn Rock, WC, WJ. Pretty much the hole thing. He said it was like watching a movie of the line. (Thanks Dad!) It took four hours to cover the Bergen. We didn't even do the branch lines. Oh, he totally recognized the Holiday Inn at Saddlebrook (it looks like the Capital Records building in LA). Last, in Hoboken, he said where did you get those signals? (the tri-lights are post Conrail). So all in all, the route is gorgeous, but, for him, what we need to capture is loaded versus unloaded cars placed in random sections of the train, more emphasis in using the train brake over use the engine brake or dynamic and ensuring the signals show restricted when they are supposed too. (sounds like he wants Run*8!)
We were doing the grand tour so he didn't get a change to drive. And this isn't much different than our other conversations. I think the scope of the route itself kinda of blew him away. I put all this crap in there because, well because its there AND he might of saw it once on the rare occasion he was looking out the cab. Basically, he didn't see crap other than his gauges and the next signal. He was too busy 'feeling' the train to think about where he was.
I didn't know this but he was on the Piermont 3 times, he hated the job at BT (only the Patterson drill was worse) and he drove once or twice through the Bergen Cut.
Overall the route passes muster - he knew where he was on the line and was predicting the next curve and or stations well in advance based on the visual cues he was getting from the route on Train Simulator. Do note, the last time he was on the line was 1978.
A very cool 5 hours with my Dad.
The rest of you - please get on the route West of Hillburn and take some screens already!
"In business, I prefer to keep company with honest men, so I ship on the Erie"