One From Brickyard with Fence put in and one from Cassandra in the snow.
One From Brickyard with Fence put in and one from Cassandra in the snow.CASO wrote:Looks great, I think in terms of legality, as long as you ask permission of rs.com and release it as freeware you're okay. There is a different version of TS2013's Cajon Pass that has scale rail and was released as freeware so and they didn't get into trouble, so if you just upload it to the file library like that you're cool.

mdurdan wrote:1225fan5358 wrote:He doesn't even need perms from RSC. As long as its free ware he's good.
Actually since this route isnt freeware (it is payware from RSC) he will have to do this a certain way to be able to LEGALLY release this. Were working on getting only the bare bones to release than after we will have to get the ok from RSC just to be safe.

PapaXpress wrote:I'm sorry but the copyright act will not protect his work if he included "payware" assets in this "freeware" route without RSC's permission. In fact the copyright laws would protect RSC if he did.
There is a way to do this though. When you package your route make sure none of the payware assets are included, and then in the Readme inform the user they need to purchase the assets from Steam (in this case I would think HSC).
This is not a new concept. Route creators have been doing it this way all the time. Using ScaleRail is another example of where the user would need to download additional content to make the route run.
How could I miss this. Here is fitting example:
viewtopic.php?p=82569#p82569


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests