Tennessee short lines in trouble

Grab a rock, have a seat, and talk about the real world of trains.

Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby OldProf » Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:46 am

The following article appeared in Sunday, Nov. 10 issue of Nashville's newspaper, The Tennessean:

Derailed?

Threats to state’s smaller railroads could hamper economic development efforts

By G. Chambers Williams III

The Tennessean
Across Tennessee and throughout the nation, hundreds of short-line rail­roads work around the clock to deliver raw ma­terials and finished products on thousands of miles of tracks that, for the most part, were once operated by the nation’s major railroads.

For economic developers, these short lines are a key tool in their efforts to attract new industry.

“The Nashville and East­ern (Railroad) is vital to us,” said G.C. Hixson, director of the Wilson County Joint Eco­nomic and Community Devel­opment Board. “With a lot of these heavy industries that we’re trying to recruit, you’re not even in the running if you don’t have rail to offer. It’s necessary that we have the service, and that we have prop­erty available along these rail lines.”

Unlike the big Class 1 rail­roads, such as CSX and Nor­folk Southern, these smaller lines — known as Class 3 rail­roads — run on short stretches of track that largely have been abandoned by the Class 1 lines because they weren’t profit­able — or profitable enough to justify keeping them in their systems.

Tennessee has 18 short lines, with nearly 900 miles of track, most of them created by the state and local governments that stepped in to save routes they saw as necessary to keep industries that rely on rail shipments. In many cases, taking over those lines saved precious jobs. Some have some really big customers, such as the short line in Chattanooga that serves the new Volks­wagen plant. Since these authorities took over, the state has spent more than $80 million to rehabilitate the lines that had mostly fallen into disrepair in their final years under ownership by the Class 1 railroads, said Val Kel­ley, managing director of the Lebanon-based Nashville and Eastern Railroad Authority. Money for the track work comes from the state’s Short Line Equity Fund, which gets its money from a 7 percent tax the state charges on diesel fuel for railroad locomotives.

That fund has now been frozen as the result of federal court lawsuits by the Class 1 railroads claiming that the tax is discriminatory, a move that now threatens to shut down the state’s entire short-line net­work. In mid-October, a feder­al judge in Nashville stopped the state from collecting the tax, and payments to the short­line railroads were sus­pended pending the out­come of appeals.

And this court fight could have major impli­cations for companies across the state that rely on these rails to conduct daily business.

Recruiting industry

Two recent successes for Hixson’s department were made possible by having the Nashville and Eastern Railroad, he said.

Kenwal Steel Corp., based in Dearborn, Mich., opened a sheet­metal processing plant in the Martha community in Lebanon in 2007, and the Italy-based So.F.Ter U.S., a plastics company, now has a plant under con­struction next to Kenwal that is scheduled to open early next year. Together, they will account for several hundred jobs.

“Having short-line rail service gives us an op­portunity that other com­munities don’t have to attract those kinds of heavy industries that traditionally pay more than others,” Hixson said. “Kenwal Steel is one of our higher-paying employers.”

Kenwal’s plant sup­plies rolls of cut sheet steel primarily to auto­motive seat manufactur­ers throughout the South and Midwest. The sheet metal comes in on rail cars — about 140 a month, said plant man­ager Phillip W. Shaub. It ends up in Ford, General Motors and Chrysler vehicles.

“Rail was a key part of our decision to locate here,” Shaub said. “We keep 30,000 tons of raw material on the floor here at all times, and almost all of it comes in by rail. One rail car can bring in four times as much steel as a single truck. Without that service, we would be at a competitive disad­vantage.”

Industries also like working with the short lines more than with the larger railroads because they feel they get better service, Shaub said.

“We’ve had other loca­tions on the Class 1 lines, but we wanted the kind of customer service you get from a short line,” he said. “We’ve worked well with the Nashville and Eastern. I can pick up the phone and get the presi­dent of the company on the line. I could never get the president of CSX to take my call — I prob­ably couldn’t even get their dispatcher.” The Nashville and Eastern also runs train­loads of crushed stone from Gordonsville to Nashville for the Rogers Group, and brings in hoppers full of sand from amine in Monterey for asphalt and concrete producer LoJac in Leba­non and Hermitage.

“The railroad is ex­tremely important to us,” said Rogers Group CEO Jerry Geraghty. “After river barge, rail is the most-efficient form of transportation. It’s much more efficient on a train than a truck, and in this market, short-line rail­roads are a critical part of the transportation network. We do some transport on CSX, but the short line here is very responsive and easy to deal with. Customer ser­vice is one of their strengths.”

Nashville and Eastern/ Nashville and Western President Bill Drunsic helped found the two lines in 1986 as the state Department of Trans­portation was setting up the network of rail au­thorities that took over the routes abandoned by the Class 1 railroads.

“We were already operating a couple of railroads in the western part of the state, and this came up and was a larger operation,” Dunsic said. “We took the opportunity, and we helped negotiate the purchase price of the line from Nashville to Monterey. We’ve grown substantially over the years, and we serve a number of key industries in the area.”

Kenwal Steel is the biggest customer of the Nashville and Eastern, followed by the Rogers Group, Drunsic said. On the Nashville and West­ern, the top customer is Trinity Marine, whose plant along the Cumber­land River just south of Ashland City makes river barges. The raw steel for the barges comes in on the trains.

Customer service

While Drunsic’s rail­road company is respon­sible for routine mainte­nance of the lines, major projects such as bridges, new spurs and upgrades — like the improvements necessary to run the higher-speed Music City Star passenger trains — have until now been paid for by the state’s Short Line Equity Fund.

“We’re going to be in a real bind if we don’t have that money anymore,” said Kelley, whose au­thority handles major improvements on the Nashville and Eastern route. “We’re also look­ing at extending our line to Oliver Springs, where it would connect to the Norfolk Southern.”

Drunsic said that ex­tension is a priority of his company, as well. “Our long-term goal is to connect the end of our line all the way to Knox­ville so there would be a mid-Tennessee route from Memphis to Knox­ville,” he said. “That area between Monterey and Knoxville was deliberate­ly broken up in the bank­ruptcy of the Tennessee Central to eliminate com­petition, back in the time before trucks became so dominant.” Besides freight traffic and the Music City Star, the Nashville and East­ern Railroad also hosts about two-dozen pas­senger rail excursions annually, operated by the Tennessee Central Rail­road Museum near down­town Nashville.

“Some go as far as Watertown, some to Cookeville, and a couple times in spring and fall they do the entire line,” he said.

For now, the short-line authorities are waiting for word as to when or whether their funding will continue. The Nash­ville and Eastern Rail­road Authority has a $255,000 payment due in January on a $2.5 million loan it took out to pay for improvements that al­lowed the Music City Star to run on its tracks.

It has a $405,000 pay­ment due in June on the $7.5 million loan it re­ceived to rehabilitate the line from Cookeville to the LoJac sand mine in Monterey.

“We have no idea what’s going to happen,” Kelley said. “Without the state’s help, we can’t make these payments. That’s where the money comes from, and we have no other source of funds.”

The short lines are looking to the legislature to come up with a perma­nent solution to the fund­ing crisis, he said.


These two side-bars accompanied it:

A Day on the Short Line is full of Stops

Engineer Bill Woodruff opens the throttle and the giant General Electric locomotive begins moving the Nashville and Eastern Railroad train out of the rail yard at the end of Stanley Street near downtown Nashville.

Today, the GE Dash-8 diesel is pulling about a dozen cars, most of them loaded with plas­tic pellets along the route east toward Hermitage.

At the end of the train is an open car stacked with gypsum wallboard, destined for Valley Interior Products, just a few hundred yards away. That car came in earlier in the day from the junction with the CSX Rail­road near 100 Oaks Mall.

Conductor David Sarnes hops off the engine, opens a gate, and then Woodruff backs the train into Valley Interior’s lot, disconnects the car and leaves it there to be unloaded.

On this day, the train will make the trip up the line’s Old Hickory Branch, a 14-mile run to the rail yard next to the former Du Pont plant. There, the carloads of plastic will be dropped off, some for the Fiberweb plant that uses part of the old Du Pont property to make plastic wraps and tex­tiles. Others will be left there for a trucking company, Hoff­man Transportation, which offloads the pellets into long, green hopper trailers that take the product to plants that man­ufacture a variety of plastic goods.

On the way back, there are other stops. More plastic beads are dropped off at FlexSol Packaging on Visco Drive, which makes plastic bags. Some empty cars are picked up from Mid-South Wire Co., whose plant is on the same spur line, and the train heads on back toward downtown.

It’s all in a day’s work for the Nashville and Eastern, a small railroad operation known as a “short line,” whose trains run over the 110 miles of track between Nashville and Mon­erey on the old Tennessee Central Railroad line.

“My day is filled with back­ing up, pulling forward, and backing up again,” Woodruff said.

The first 30 miles of the line, between Nashville and Lebanon, also serves the Music City Star commuter service.

— G. Chambers Williams III

TENNESSEE SHORT LINE RAILROADS

There are 18 short-line railroads in Tennessee, most of them operated by governmental rail authori­ties and leased to private operators. Nearly 900 miles of track are under the control of the short-line operators, and they haul millions of tons of com­modities annually, handing the shipments over to the Class 1 railroads such as CSX and Norfolk Southern. Middle Tennessee short lines include: » Nashville and Eastern Railroad Authority, upon whose tracks run trains of the Music City Star com­muter line and the pri­vately held Nashville and Eastern Railroad, a freight carrier. It runs 110 miles from Nashville to Monterey. Key customers: Coca-Cola, Kenwal Steel, LoJac Materials, Mid-South Wire, Georgia Pacific, Dow Chemical. » Cheatham County Rail­road Authority, operated by the Nashville and Western Railroad Corp., 16.7 miles between Nash­ville and Ashland City. Key customers include Ashland Chemical, Jefferson Smurfit and U.S. Tobacco.

Another key short line operating in Middle Ten­nessee is the R.J. Corman Railroad, which runs from Cumberland City through Clarksville to Guthrie, Ky., and will serve the Hankook Tire plant in Clarksville.


This photo accompanied the first sidebar:
Image
Bill sure takes good care of that engine!
Tom Pallen (Old Prof)

{Win 10 Home 64-bit; Intel Core i7 6700 @ 3.40GHz; 16.0GB Single-Channel @ 1063 MHz (15-15-15-364); 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960}
User avatar
OldProf
 
Posts: 2743
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:09 am

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby dejoh » Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:03 pm

Interesting reading. Thanks !!*ok*!!
User avatar
dejoh
 
Posts: 1478
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:08 pm
Location: So. Chicago Heights, Il.

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby buzz456 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:13 pm

The guvmit will find another tax to put in place to replace it. Never fear.
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 21134
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby GSkid » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:44 pm

buzz456 wrote:The guvmit will find another tax to put in place to replace it. Never fear.


That's what I fear. It's bad enough we have individuals dependent on the government. Now we have short line railroads being dependent on it too.

I can't blame CSX for suing the state. Since they buy and use far more fuel, they are disproportionally paying the bill for the short lines upkeep. If the short lines can't come up with a business model that allows them to survive without handouts, they should not exist. It's the reason I'm against government funding of Amtrak and California's cross-state high speed rail initiative. I'm sick of the government looking at taxpayers as ATM machines to constantly hit up for cash! **!!bang!!**
EMD 2-strokes rule! My all time favorite: SD45X also love the SD40-2/SD40T-2/SD45-2/SD45T-2/DD35A/DDA40X/SD70ACe/SD80ACe

Southern Pacific RR! Bloody nose/Serif lettering - Donner Pass/Tehachapi Pass/Cajon Pass/UP Coast Line


i7-11800H // RTX 3070 // 16GB DDR4 // 2TB SSD // 16” 165Hz WQXGA 16:10 w/G-Sync // TS Classic // TSW5 // Run 8 V3
User avatar
GSkid
 
Posts: 1197
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:17 am
Location: UP's Santa Barbara subdivision - USA

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby CrimsonKing » Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:46 am

If all the railroads that operate in Tennessee have to pay the fuel tax, how is it discriminatory? Just because the Class 1s pay more than the Class 3s doesn't mean its discrimination. It sounds more like the Class 1s want more of the business that the Class 3s have and they see going after this tax as a way of trying to get that business. The problem with that though is that many of the businesses served by the Class 3s already do business with the Class 1s and would rather do all of their business with the Class 3s.

I don't blame the state for helping the Class 3s rehab and update track that otherwise might be too expensive for the Class 3s to do on their own.
Will

NERW Engineer.
User avatar
CrimsonKing
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:07 pm
Location: CO

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby GSkid » Tue Nov 12, 2013 12:48 am

CrimsonKing wrote:If all the railroads that operate in Tennessee have to pay the fuel tax, how is it discriminatory? Just because the Class 1s pay more than the Class 3s doesn't mean its discrimination. It sounds more like the Class 1s want more of the business that the Class 3s have and they see going after this tax as a way of trying to get that business. The problem with that though is that many of the businesses served by the Class 3s already do business with the Class 1s and would rather do all of their business with the Class 3s.

I don't blame the state for helping the Class 3s rehab and update track that otherwise might be too expensive for the Class 3s to do on their own.


Well I agree the wording "discrimination" is an odd use here. Not sure what the details are of the case or how CSX is being discriminated against. But I agree that it's unfair that class 1s are essentially subsidizing class 3 railroads. I'd be ticked off too if I was CSX.

As for class 1s wanting more of class 3's business and that's why they are after this tax? That makes no sense for two reasons.....

1: Most of these short lines were formally owned by the class 1s. They did a cost/benefit analysis and determined they were no longer worth keeping under their business model. So they were sold off or abandoned.

2: Unless it's strictly local traffic (i.e. a rock quarry supplying a local cement company a few miles down the line), those class 1s will get that business that needs to go beyond that short line's system. Either by hauling the cars themselves or from fees charging them for usage of their system directly through trackage rights agreements.

Don't blame the state for helping? I do! I own a house and the roof needs replacing. If I don't have the money to fix it, I take out a loan. If I can't get a loan AND don't have the money, then I have no business owning a house that is beyond my means to maintain. I don't hit up the state for money to fix it. My house, my responsibility.

And before anybody says "Well the short lines paid into the fund through fuel taxes, so they are entitled to that money". And my response is... "Ok. But they should only receive the amount of money they paid into the fund. They have to make up on their own any shortfalls after that.....via out of pocket, a bank loan or money from investors."
EMD 2-strokes rule! My all time favorite: SD45X also love the SD40-2/SD40T-2/SD45-2/SD45T-2/DD35A/DDA40X/SD70ACe/SD80ACe

Southern Pacific RR! Bloody nose/Serif lettering - Donner Pass/Tehachapi Pass/Cajon Pass/UP Coast Line


i7-11800H // RTX 3070 // 16GB DDR4 // 2TB SSD // 16” 165Hz WQXGA 16:10 w/G-Sync // TS Classic // TSW5 // Run 8 V3
User avatar
GSkid
 
Posts: 1197
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:17 am
Location: UP's Santa Barbara subdivision - USA

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby BNSFdude » Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:18 pm

The Class 3's infrastructure is necessary for expansion and growth. Look what happened to the lines where Class 1s abandoned and tore up the tracks! Industries sprung up within the last 30 years where tracks once were and could have really used the transportation network.
Anthony Wood
Audio Engineer - Searchlight Simulations
User avatar
BNSFdude
 
Posts: 2721
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:46 am

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby CrimsonKing » Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:32 pm

GSkid, as long as there are taxes, somebody will be subsidizing somebody else.

It would be one thing if the routes the Class 1s got rid of weren't profitable at all. Obviously there is some profit there or the Class 3s wouldn't be operating to serve those businesses that find it better to ship by rail than by truck but aren't in an area served by a Class 1. As BNSFdude pointed out, many of the businesses that use the Class 3s weren't there when the Class 1s chose to stop using the line and sold off or abandoned it. Now that those businesses are there and the lines are profitable again, would it surprise you that a Class 1 like CSX would try to get the lines back by claiming the fuel tax is unfair?
Will

NERW Engineer.
User avatar
CrimsonKing
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:07 pm
Location: CO

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby SouthernPacific-Mike » Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:50 pm

As other have said, if all railroads pay a fuel tax then its cannot be illegal. Don't think for one minute that CSX hasn't benefited from it, at least indirectly. The short lines connect with them and other class I's, and therefore bring them business as well. As other's have said Class I's have abandon or given up rights to the rail, because the volume of business does not justify the cost (maintenance, etc. vs. Volume) in the big picture to them. Though you don't see an immediate benefit, on your tax dollar, you and they are getting their money's worth. Example: If there were no short lines then many companies would by-pass that location as the cost to move bulk material is much cheaper to move by rail than by truck. If there was no trains then some areas would have increased Semi Trailer traffic. Which means more traffic, more wear and tear on the bridges and roads, not to mention the increase of hazardous material on the public road system. Granted there is a lot of dangerous material that is move by Semi-Truck today, but just imagine all of the stuff that is carried by rail that would have to be carried by truck now. Additionally, indirectly prices would increase in many goods you and I purchase. Local jobs in the area, both directly and indirectly would be lost or would be in jeopardy. Which would mean less local taxes and more tax money spent on unemployment. Then there are other things to consider as well, such as air pollution and loss of right of way etc. There was an excellent article in one of my "Train" magazines a couple of months back, it gave you a look at the Santa Maria Railroad. You would be amazed at the amount of streamlining and what they have to do to keep running. I don't think that the Class III's are given a free ride either, it is probably only for really expensive repairs. I would imagine also the Class III will have to come-up with a portion of the funds themselves or possibly a low cost loan or grant provided they meet certain conditions. I would imagine if you did a full fledge cost benefit analysis it would reveal even more. It's like the DOD, many people don't realize just what it actually brings to the table by them (jobs, research, innovation, world stability, etc.). When you look at the military, has been on a steady decline while entitlements have been on a continual steady increase.
SouthernPacific-Mike
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:44 pm

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby GSkid » Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:26 am

CrimsonKing wrote:GSkid, as long as there are taxes, somebody will be subsidizing somebody else.

It would be one thing if the routes the Class 1s got rid of weren't profitable at all. Obviously there is some profit there or the Class 3s wouldn't be operating to serve those businesses that find it better to ship by rail than by truck but aren't in an area served by a Class 1. As BNSFdude pointed out, many of the businesses that use the Class 3s weren't there when the Class 1s chose to stop using the line and sold off or abandoned it. Now that those businesses are there and the lines are profitable again, would it surprise you that a Class 1 like CSX would try to get the lines back by claiming the fuel tax is unfair?


Which is precisely why I'm against most (but not all) taxation. It's legalized theft. If a bunch of people go to a company and steal their money, they go to jail for theft. But if that same group all became lawmakers, they can pass a tax that takes money away from the company legally. Then instead of that bunch of people going to jail, it's the company officials that are facing legal action if they don't pay up. It's a racket!

I'm a free market guy. I don't believe in government picking winners and losers. If these class 3 railroads can't make it without subsidies, then they need to fail. And if CSX comes in and buys the lines, so be it. That's how the free market works.

To SouthernPacific-Mike ....

If costs increase directly or indirectly to the consumer, that's the way it should be. You should pay what it costs to make and deliver something. Not get it at an artificially low price cuz you are forcing someone else to make up the shortfall towards it's real cost. That's not fair to those being forced to make up the difference.

As for the cost benefit analysis? If it amounts to more unemployment in a particular area, that's just how it goes. Markets and geographic areas are fluid and evolve. Jobs and industries shouldn't be artificially propped up..... and that includes railroads.
EMD 2-strokes rule! My all time favorite: SD45X also love the SD40-2/SD40T-2/SD45-2/SD45T-2/DD35A/DDA40X/SD70ACe/SD80ACe

Southern Pacific RR! Bloody nose/Serif lettering - Donner Pass/Tehachapi Pass/Cajon Pass/UP Coast Line


i7-11800H // RTX 3070 // 16GB DDR4 // 2TB SSD // 16” 165Hz WQXGA 16:10 w/G-Sync // TS Classic // TSW5 // Run 8 V3
User avatar
GSkid
 
Posts: 1197
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:17 am
Location: UP's Santa Barbara subdivision - USA

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby buzz456 » Fri Nov 15, 2013 7:35 am

It's all George Bush's fault. !*roll-laugh*! !*roll-laugh*! !*roll-laugh*!
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 21134
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby OldProf » Fri Nov 15, 2013 10:40 am

Nah! Let's blame the Tea Party: they're more fun to tickle.

!*roll-laugh*!
Tom Pallen (Old Prof)

{Win 10 Home 64-bit; Intel Core i7 6700 @ 3.40GHz; 16.0GB Single-Channel @ 1063 MHz (15-15-15-364); 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960}
User avatar
OldProf
 
Posts: 2743
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:09 am

Re: Tennessee short lines in trouble

Unread postby PolyesterMafia » Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:24 am

Very informative. I was under the impression that CSX served the auto-plant in Chattanooga, as it's branch line runs from just west of Jersey into the yard on the west end of Enterprise South. So I suppose if you still have a functional copy of the Atlanta North District route, Kraut Motor Company could be freelanced. !*don-know!*
PolyesterMafia
 


Return to The Jungle

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests