Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Grab a rock, have a seat, and talk about the real world of trains.

Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby wacampbell » Thu May 14, 2015 8:40 am

Did anyone see this CNN clip where a railroad trainer was demonstrating train speeds on a training simulator.
What was interesting is the simulator was made from full size loco controls connected to our old friend Rail Simulator.

Image1.jpg


Image2.jpg


PS - I was watching a live stream - so I am not able to provide a link unfortunately.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Wayne Campbell
wacampbell
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:45 pm
Location: BC, Canada

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby BigBoyMoon » Thu May 14, 2015 7:33 pm

I see they don't know there's an update out
~4 years later
ayy de la mao
User avatar
BigBoyMoon
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:05 pm
Location: BFE

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby buzz456 » Thu May 14, 2015 7:55 pm

Or maybe because they are not gamers what they have is plenty for what they are trying to do.
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 21086
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby Bananarama » Fri May 15, 2015 2:46 pm

The system might be isolated from the 'net, or that the system requirements and overhead for RS is quite small when compared to RW.

Besides which, these "news" groups (CNN, Fox, et al.) are more interested in glitzy productions rather than raw substance.

I do find the control desktop very interesting, however. :D
Cheers!
Marc - 3DTrains

Image
User avatar
Bananarama
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:17 am
Location: Another Planet

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby wacampbell » Fri May 15, 2015 2:58 pm

Yah, I was surprised that real life railroads would be using our Rail Simulator for professional training. It was a pretty elaborate setup, with the cab simulator in what appeared to be a railroad company training room. I came into the middle of the clip and didn't catch which railroad. He demonstrated stopping a train from 100 MPH and demonstrated taking a train through a curve at 50 MPH and 100 MPH, with the train derailing on the second run. I think he was running on the Castle Rock route, but I am not certain. I wonder if they were using 'stock physics' or if the RR had done some work to customize the engine and wagon files for an improved simulation.
Wayne Campbell
wacampbell
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:45 pm
Location: BC, Canada

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby davedingler » Sat May 16, 2015 10:03 am

If it were a true simulator, the cab is more than likely to be a true replica of the actual engine being simulated. All controls would work just like in the real thing with the forces and travels of controls simulated exactly as in the simulated engine. The visual system is probably actual footage of the route being simulated and the sounds would be actual sound recordings of the operation of the real engine on the route being simulated.

Just a thought from an old flight simulator design engineer.

Dave
davedingler
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:44 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby RudolfJan » Mon May 25, 2015 3:20 pm

wacampbell wrote:Yah, I was surprised that real life railroads would be using our Rail Simulator for professional training. It was a pretty elaborate setup, with the cab simulator in what appeared to be a railroad company training room. I came into the middle of the clip and didn't catch which railroad. He demonstrated stopping a train from 100 MPH and demonstrated taking a train through a curve at 50 MPH and 100 MPH, with the train derailing on the second run. I think he was running on the Castle Rock route, but I am not certain. I wonder if they were using 'stock physics' or if the RR had done some work to customize the engine and wagon files for an improved simulation.

May seem curious, but for training getting used to signalling and keeping concentration it may work and is much cheaper than a full blown simulator. You cannot learn to drive though, I think. If you can also bring the gauges outside the screen that may help a lot ...
Rudolf

http://www.hollandhiking.nl/trainsimulator
Here you will find the latest version of the Senario Authors Guide, TSW starters Guide, LuaCreator and TSWTools and more ...
RudolfJan
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:36 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby Merlin75 » Fri May 29, 2015 4:34 pm

First Scotrail also use or used a version of TS for training. One of the UK routes Glasgow Airport - Glasgow along with the Glass 380 EMU started out being made for Scotrail and only ended up in game when the plans for the real route to the airport were shelved. But it's interesting to see real railways using TS.
Merlin75
 
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 5:17 am
Location: Cornwall

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby BNSFdude » Sun May 31, 2015 11:07 pm

I wouldn't even remotely consider MODOC a real railroad by any sort or means. Besides, paying for training you'll receive from the carrier of choice is a joke now days anyways.
Why pay x amount of money for training for 6 mo when the railroad will do it in 17 weeks, and do it right?
All MODOC does is produce know-it-all railroaders that no one likes to work with.
Anthony Wood
Audio Engineer - Searchlight Simulations
User avatar
BNSFdude
 
Posts: 2721
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:46 am

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby GSkid » Mon Jun 01, 2015 3:16 am

BNSFdude wrote:I wouldn't even remotely consider MODOC a real railroad by any sort or means. Besides, paying for training you'll receive from the carrier of choice is a joke now days anyways.
Why pay x amount of money for training for 6 mo when the railroad will do it in 17 weeks, and do it right?
All MODOC does is produce know-it-all railroaders that no one likes to work with.


Well I'd imagine like any other industry, railroads would prefer an applicant have some experience than none at all. I can't see how that wouldn't give an individual a better chance of consideration for the position in a sea of applicants that have no experience whatsoever. I'd certainly consider it worth the money if I got the job.... when without it my odds were considerably lower.
EMD 2-strokes rule! My all time favorite: SD45X also love the SD40-2/SD40T-2/SD45-2/SD45T-2/DD35A/DDA40X/SD70ACe/SD80ACe

Southern Pacific RR! Bloody nose/Serif lettering - Donner Pass/Tehachapi Pass/Cajon Pass/UP Coast Line


i7-11800H // RTX 3070 // 16GB DDR4 // 2TB SSD // 16” 165Hz WQXGA 16:10 w/G-Sync // TS Classic // TSW5 // Run 8 V3
User avatar
GSkid
 
Posts: 1197
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:17 am
Location: UP's Santa Barbara subdivision - USA

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby BNSFdude » Tue Jun 02, 2015 7:21 pm

It's a 20,000 dollar job interview, as we say. The exclusivity of railroading has long since gone.
The majority of buffs from that go to MODOC or NARS even is someone who knows it all. No one likes that guy.
Anthony Wood
Audio Engineer - Searchlight Simulations
User avatar
BNSFdude
 
Posts: 2721
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:46 am

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby GSkid » Wed Jun 03, 2015 3:18 am

BNSFdude wrote:It's a 20,000 dollar job interview, as we say. The exclusivity of railroading has long since gone.
The majority of buffs from that go to MODOC or NARS even is someone who knows it all. No one likes that guy.


Well a private college that has a low job placement rate, doesn't stay in business long. If these railroad schools didn't have decent placement rates, word would get out (especially in the internet age) and the schools wouldn't last. Cuz people aren't gonna enroll in schools that give out $20k pieces of paper with little real job prospects.

I know and have known people in the railroad industry. I've read lots of posts on various forums from others in the industry. What I have gathered is that these positions are highly coveted and the competition is pretty fierce. Lots of applicants for limited positions. If a degree gets you far more offers or chances than someone without one, then money well spent. If not... then I would agree with you Anthony.

As for a know it all? I can tolerate them far more than a know little or know nothing. I'd rather tweak into shape someone who knows most of the stuff already than someone I need to train on what to do. Hence why lots of jobs openings in life prefer, require or otherwise give a leg up to those with experience.
EMD 2-strokes rule! My all time favorite: SD45X also love the SD40-2/SD40T-2/SD45-2/SD45T-2/DD35A/DDA40X/SD70ACe/SD80ACe

Southern Pacific RR! Bloody nose/Serif lettering - Donner Pass/Tehachapi Pass/Cajon Pass/UP Coast Line


i7-11800H // RTX 3070 // 16GB DDR4 // 2TB SSD // 16” 165Hz WQXGA 16:10 w/G-Sync // TS Classic // TSW5 // Run 8 V3
User avatar
GSkid
 
Posts: 1197
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:17 am
Location: UP's Santa Barbara subdivision - USA

Re: Rail Simulator on CNN - Used for Engineer Training

Unread postby FourEightFour » Wed Jun 03, 2015 11:02 pm

I personally use this simulator to keep up on my skills as a steam engineer in the off season, I just had to wait for one realistic enough. I noticed a large difference in train handling at the start of this season.



As far as a know it all: people that know it all are a real bothersome to those that do.
User avatar
FourEightFour
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 10:35 pm
Location: Colorado


Return to The Jungle

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest