(Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Grab a rock, have a seat, and talk about the real world of trains.

(Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby Brickrail782 » Thu Jul 27, 2017 11:18 pm

I noticed that the series of scenarios for the UP GTEL seem to revolve around UP restoring and returning their two remaining turbines into active service. If this actually happened, what physical changes would be made to the train itself?
User avatar
Brickrail782
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 6:47 am
Location: Kansas City, KS

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby ErikGorbiHamilton » Thu Jul 27, 2017 11:31 pm

The first thing to obviously go would be changing the fuel to something more green.
User avatar
ErikGorbiHamilton
 
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby BNSFdude » Fri Jul 28, 2017 4:15 am

ErikGorbiHamilton wrote:The first thing to obviously go would be changing the fuel to something more green.

Pff.
Anthony Wood
Audio Engineer - Searchlight Simulations
User avatar
BNSFdude
 
Posts: 2721
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:46 am

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby buzz456 » Fri Jul 28, 2017 8:03 am

ErikGorbiHamilton wrote:The first thing to obviously go would be changing the fuel to something more green.

Why would you want to do that when airliners are burning Millions of gallons a day of a more refined version and all of the ships running around the world are burning the same stuff?
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 21103
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby JOHNtheREDNECK » Fri Jul 28, 2017 4:20 pm

First modifications to be made would be to first stop the turbine from it's infamous nickname "big blow". Then they would need to work on some sort of system to help the engine breathe better in tunnels. They would also need to modify the turbine and maybe create a more advanced exhaust port so as it passes by people they won't get their eardrums destroyed. I would also think they would want to modify the fuel from that Bunker C stuff to a fuel type that's easier to get in this day and age like JP7/8. No matter how you look at it restoring a turbine is not very practical in real life without some serious engineering-design work on top of the overall restoration.
New York State is not the same as New York City
User avatar
JOHNtheREDNECK
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 6:45 pm
Location: Finger Lakes region, New York State

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby gtrtroger » Fri Jul 28, 2017 4:34 pm

Restoration
"...the action of returning something to a former owner, place, or condition."

Put it back exactly like it was. You don't see restorers put electric motors in steam engines, do you?
User avatar
gtrtroger
 
Posts: 1240
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:31 am
Location: Montgomery, Alabama

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby buzz456 » Fri Jul 28, 2017 5:14 pm

gtrtroger wrote:Restoration
"...the action of returning something to a former owner, place, or condition."

Put it back exactly like it was. You don't see restorers put electric motors in steam engines, do you?


!!*ok*!! After all it wouldn't be like it was going to be put back in regular service.
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 21103
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby JOHNtheREDNECK » Fri Jul 28, 2017 5:40 pm

buzz456 wrote:
gtrtroger wrote:Restoration
"...the action of returning something to a former owner, place, or condition."

Put it back exactly like it was. You don't see restorers put electric motors in steam engines, do you?


!!*ok*!! After all it wouldn't be like it was going to be put back in regular service.


I would think quite a few government agencies would have issues now a days with doing an old school restoration on a locomotive design with such a spotty record and would deny all of the paperwork needed to run the locomotive.
New York State is not the same as New York City
User avatar
JOHNtheREDNECK
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 6:45 pm
Location: Finger Lakes region, New York State

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby buzz456 » Fri Jul 28, 2017 7:14 pm

JOHNtheREDNECK wrote:
buzz456 wrote:
gtrtroger wrote:Restoration
"...the action of returning something to a former owner, place, or condition."

Put it back exactly like it was. You don't see restorers put electric motors in steam engines, do you?


!!*ok*!! After all it wouldn't be like it was going to be put back in regular service.


I would think quite a few government agencies would have issues now a days with doing an old school restoration on a locomotive design with such a spotty record and would deny all of the paperwork needed to run the locomotive.


They let coal burning steam engines run around and lots of old cars that don't meet emission standards and legacy jets and round engine aircraft that don't meet sound level standards. Why not your odd turbine locomotive?
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 21103
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby gtrtroger » Fri Jul 28, 2017 7:36 pm

Flying everyday.....speaking of government agencies of course.....
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
gtrtroger
 
Posts: 1240
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:31 am
Location: Montgomery, Alabama

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby buzz456 » Fri Jul 28, 2017 7:50 pm

That reminds me of a few years ago when we were taking some friends to Ft. Meyers main airport RSW and this smokey thing that looked like a 707 was blasting out of there looking like this B52 picture and I said "oh it must be a USAF tanker". My friend said "how can you tell?" I answered" The government writes rules for everyone to obey except them."
Buzz
39 and holding.
"Some people find fault like there's a reward for it."- Zig Ziglar
"If you can dream it you can do it."- Walt Disney
Image
User avatar
buzz456
Site Admin
 
Posts: 21103
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:30 am
Location: SW Florida

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby ozinoz » Sat Jul 29, 2017 4:57 pm

As an aside, I managed to see a B52 (and nol it wasn't Kate Pearson *!lol!* ) in the flesh in about 187 when the USAF flew one in from Guam to do some fly overs in conjunction with the Australian Formula 1 Grand Prix in Adelaide. How the hell those things ever (and continue) to fly is beyond me. Its all wing (which I know is needed to provide lift for payload) - it just looks so out of proportion *!!wink!!*

!*cheers*!
ozinoz
 
Posts: 1622
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:59 am
Location: Antipodes

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby JOHNtheREDNECK » Sat Jul 29, 2017 8:08 pm

ozinoz wrote:As an aside, I managed to see a B52 (and nol it wasn't Kate Pearson *!lol!* ) in the flesh in about 187 when the USAF flew one in from Guam to do some fly overs in conjunction with the Australian Formula 1 Grand Prix in Adelaide. How the hell those things ever (and continue) to fly is beyond me. Its all wing (which I know is needed to provide lift for payload) - it just looks so out of proportion *!!wink!!*

!*cheers*!


Well hey, Buzz could not have said it any better. That's gotta go down as his quote of the year or something.
New York State is not the same as New York City
User avatar
JOHNtheREDNECK
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 6:45 pm
Location: Finger Lakes region, New York State

Re: (Hypothetical) UP Turbine Restoration

Unread postby evafan002 » Sun Jul 30, 2017 10:41 am

gtrtroger wrote:Restoration
"...the action of returning something to a former owner, place, or condition."

Put it back exactly like it was. You don't see restorers put electric motors in steam engines, do you?

i have seen it done a few times.. miniature locos admittedly but it does happen.. ticks me off to no end too when i see some of the works of art that have been butchered to provide a 5 year old with a train of his very own....
evafan002
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:13 pm


Return to The Jungle

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest